使用日期和&&时的性能问题

在评估某些非常特殊的条件时，我正在遇到一些非常奇怪的性能行为。

基本上，我发现我可以构建两个条件a和b是if(a)比快10倍，if(a && b)即使a是始终为假，这似乎直接与事实的Java应该做的条件懒评价发生冲突。

当我有发生的情况下a是someDate.after(startdate)与b是someDate.before(enddate)即一个相当标准的范围条件- 。

在下面，我附加了用于显示此特定问题的代码。我已经在带有Java 7的Windows 7上运行了该代码，而我的一位同事已经在带有Java 6,7和8的Windows 7上运行了这些代码-都具有相同的结果。

谁能解释为什么会这样？

import java.util.Date;

public class DateWeirdness {
public static void main(String[] args) {
    Date start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a) - a always false");
    System.out.println(timeBasic(2000000000, start, start.getTime() - 4000000000L));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a && b) - a always false, a and b both date method");
    System.out.println(timeAdv(2000000000, start, start.getTime() - 4000000000L, new Date()));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a && b) - a always false, b is condition on longs not date");
    System.out.println(timeAdv2(2000000000, start, start.getTime() - 4000000000L, new Date().getTime()));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a) - a always false - condition on long");
    System.out.println(timeBasicL(2000000000, start.getTime(), start.getTime() - 4000000000L));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a && b) - a always false, a and and b both conditions on long");
    System.out.println(timeAdvL(2000000000, start.getTime(), start.getTime() - 4000000000L, new Date().getTime()));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a && b) - a always false, b always true");
    System.out.println(timeAdv(2000000000, start, start.getTime() - 4000000000L, new Date()));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a && b) - both true");
    System.out.println(timeAdv(2000000000, start, start.getTime() + 1, new Date(start.getTime() + 4000000000L)));
    start = new Date();
    System.out.println("if(a && b) - a always true, b always false");
    System.out.println(timeAdv(2000000000, start, new Date(start.getTime() + 4000000001L).getTime(), new Date(start.getTime() + 4000000000L)));
}

private static int timeBasic(int size, Date start, long l) {
    long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    int c = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        Date date = new Date(l++);
        if (start.before(date)) {
            c++;
        }
    }
    System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - begin);
    return c;
}

private static int timeAdv(int size, Date start, long l, Date end) {
    long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    int c = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        Date date = new Date(l++);
        if (start.before(date) && end.after(date)) {
            c++;
        }
    }
    System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - begin);
    return c;
}

private static int timeAdv2(int size, Date start, long l, long end) {
    long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    int c = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        Date date = new Date(l++);
        if (start.before(date) && end > l) {
            c++;
        }
    }
    System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - begin);
    return c;
}

private static int timeBasicL(int size, long start, long l) {
    long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    int c = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        l++;
        if (start < l) {
            c++;
        }
    }
    System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - begin);
    return c;
}

private static int timeAdvL(int size, long start, long l, long end) {
    long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    int c = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        l++;
        if (start < l && end > l) {
            c++;
        }
    }
    System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - begin);
    return c;
}
}

在本地运行时，我得到以下输出。有趣的测试是前三个测试。640是执行的毫秒数if(a)，7079是执行的性能if(a && b)，其中a和b如上所述。710是这样做的性能if(a && b)哪里b是someDateAsLong < endDateAsLong。

if(a) - a always false
640
0
if(a && b) - a always false, a and b both date method
7079
0
if(a && b) - a always false, b is condition on longs not date
710
0
if(a) - a always false - condition on long
639
0
if(a && b) - a always false, a and and b both conditions on long
708
0
if(a && b) - a always false, b always true
6873
0
if(a && b) - both true
11995
2000000000
if(a && b) - a always true, b always false
13746
0