包含循环的静态方法是否是线程安全的?

JamMaster

我有一个巨大的循环,我想分成4个线程。我这样做是使用一点笨拙的方法(也许不是?),并将for循环的计数器分成4个间隔,为每个线程创建一个新的Printwriter和CrucibleOptimizer,这样就不会出现冲突,如下所示:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
    Runnable run1 = new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            PrintWriter writer1;
            try {
                writer1 = new PrintWriter("test_result1.txt");
                CrucibleOptimizer optimizer1 = new CrucibleOptimizer();
                int[] loop1boundries = new int[]{1, 7};
                opt(optimizer1, writer1, loop1boundries[0], loop1boundries[1]);
            } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
                System.out.println("File not found");
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    };
    Runnable run2 = new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            PrintWriter writer2;
            try {
                writer2 = new PrintWriter("test_result2.txt");
                CrucibleOptimizer optimizer2 = new CrucibleOptimizer();
                int[] loop2boundries = new int[]{8, 14};
                opt(optimizer2, writer2, loop2boundries[0], loop2boundries[1]);
            } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
                System.out.println("File not found");
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    };
    Runnable run3 = new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            PrintWriter writer3;
            try {
                writer3 = new PrintWriter("test_result3.txt");
                CrucibleOptimizer optimizer3 = new CrucibleOptimizer();
                int[] loop3boundries = new int[]{15, 22};
                opt(optimizer3, writer3, loop3boundries[0], loop3boundries[1]);
            } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
                System.out.println("File not found");
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    };
    Runnable run4 = new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            PrintWriter writer4;
            try {
                writer4 = new PrintWriter("test_result4.txt");
                CrucibleOptimizer optimizer4 = new CrucibleOptimizer();
                int[] loop4boundries = new int[]{23, 30};
                opt(optimizer4, writer4, loop4boundries[0], loop4boundries[1]);
            } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
                System.out.println("File not found");
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    };
    Thread[] threads = new Thread[]{new Thread(run1), new Thread(run2), new Thread(run3), new Thread(run4)};
    for (Thread thr : threads){
        thr.start();
    }
}

这就是我要问的方法。我不知道它的线程是否安全。我一直在阅读,谷歌说,就我没有任何局部变量而言,我很好,但是让我担心的是那些循环中的多个计数器:

    public static void opt(CrucibleOptimizer opt, PrintWriter writer, int minIncluded, int maxIncluded){
    //more than this is never used
    final int oreMaterialsMaximum = 100;//100
    final int ingotMaterialMaximum = 30;//30

    //test for every possible material combination
    for (int a = minIncluded; a <= maxIncluded; a++){//for amount of ingots
        System.out.println("Testing for ingot number: " + a);
        double ratioMin = (Reference.UNITS_IMPOSSIBLE / (double)(a * Reference.UNITS_INGOT));
        for (int i = 0; i <= (int)(100 / Reference.UNITS_IMPOSSIBLE); i++){//for every ratio possible
            double currentRatio = round(i * ratioMin, 6);
            System.out.println("Testing for ratio: " + currentRatio);
            for (int b = 0; b <= ingotMaterialMaximum; b++){//with every amount of ingots
                for (int c = 0; c <= oreMaterialsMaximum; c++){//with every amount of rich ore
                    for (int d = 0; d <= oreMaterialsMaximum; d++){//with every amount of normal ore
                        for (int e = 0; e <= oreMaterialsMaximum; e++){//with every amount of poor ore
                            for (int f = 0; f <= oreMaterialsMaximum; f++){//with every amount of small ore
                                opt.set(null, null, null, a); //only the ingots are passed in this way
                                int[] res = opt.optimizeMaterial(new int[]{c, d, e, f, b}, currentRatio);
                                if (res != null){
                                    int units = 0;
                                    for (int j = 0; j < res.length; j++)
                                        units += res[j] * Reference.MATERIAL_UNITS[j];
                                    double unitsRight = Math.round(a * Reference.UNITS_INGOT * currentRatio);
                                    if (units != (int)unitsRight){ //if the units are not correct, log
                                        writer.println("I: " + a + " Rat: " + currentRatio + " I_av: " + b + " O_Ri: " + c + " O_No: " + d +
                                                " O_Po: " + e + " O_Sm: " + f + " units_wrong: " + units + " units_right: " + (int)unitsRight);
                                    }
                                }
                            }
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    System.out.println("Testing done");
    writer.close();
}
谢尔盖·卡里尼琴科(Sergey Kalinichenko)

“不要使用静态变量”建议确实太简单了:另一个要求是不要将共享对象传递给static在不同线程中运行的方法。

循环计数器和其他原始局部变量是线程安全的。可使方法成为非线程安全的唯一方法是共享状态。通过创建单独的CrucibleOptimizerPrintWriter对象,您似乎已成功避免了这种情况

我将尝试的一种重构方法是将您的Runnables组合在一起创建一个具有循环边界的命名类,并在中创建该类的四个实例main这将比四个几乎没有什么区别的单独的匿名类更好地工作:

private static class ThreadRunnable implements Runnable {
    final String fileName;
    final int[] loopBoundaries;
    public ThreadRunnable(String fn, int[] lb) {
        fileName = fn;
        loopBoundaries = lb;
    }
    @Override
    public void run() {
        PrintWriter pw;
        try {
            pw = new PrintWriter(fileName);
            CrucibleOptimizer co = new CrucibleOptimizer();
            opt(co, pw, loop4boundries[0], loop4boundries[1]);
        } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

现在,您可以创建四个ThreadRunnable共享相同代码的实例。

本文收集自互联网,转载请注明来源。

如有侵权,请联系[email protected] 删除。

编辑于
0

我来说两句

0条评论
登录后参与评论

相关文章

来自分类Dev

静态方法是线程安全的吗?

来自分类Dev

Java - 静态方法的线程安全

来自分类Dev

是否包含java.util.List线程安全的方法?

来自分类Dev

是否包含java.util.List线程安全的方法?

来自分类Dev

修改静态变量是否线程安全?

来自分类Dev

save:方法是否是线程安全的?

来自分类Dev

Java中用于静态方法的线程安全

来自分类Dev

Java线程安全:枚举和静态方法

来自分类Dev

Java的枚举静态方法的线程安全?

来自分类Dev

Java线程安全:枚举和静态方法

来自分类Dev

在循环中创建新线程是否安全?

来自分类Dev

在 using 块中使用静态 HttpClient 是否可行/线程安全?

来自分类Dev

从实例方法线程调用静态方法安全吗?

来自分类Dev

如何在JAVA中使静态方法线程安全?

来自分类Dev

从非线程安全的方法初始化静态Java常量

来自分类Dev

此静态方法线程安全还是需要同步

来自分类Dev

线程安全Singletion静态方法初始化

来自分类Dev

是否有针对Java的循环任何优化线程安全?

来自分类Dev

线程安全加载静态集合

来自分类Dev

线程安全静态变量

来自分类Dev

Java 静态和线程安全

来自分类Dev

静态或非静态方法,线程安全适用于非方法类型

来自分类Dev

函数,线程是否安全?

来自分类Dev

在C中通过函数调用进行静态初始化是否是线程安全的?

来自分类Dev

ReentrantLock是否足够安全以保护对静态变量的多线程访问

来自分类Dev

C ++:是否使用IIFE线程安全初始化静态局部变量?

来自分类Dev

scala.collection.mutable.Stack的方法是否是线程安全的?

来自分类Dev

是否需要同步线程安全的单例方法

来自分类Dev

scala.collection.mutable.Stack的方法是否是线程安全的?

Related 相关文章

热门标签

归档