我有两个具有相同参数的相同模型。这两个都是在MNIST数据集上训练的。第一个使用model.fit()进行训练,第二个使用model.train_on_batch()进行训练。第二种模型给出的准确性较低。我想知道这可能是什么原因以及如何解决?
数据准备:
batch_size = 150
num_classes = 10
epochs = 12
# input image dimensions
img_rows, img_cols = 28, 28
# the data, split between train and test sets
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
if K.image_data_format() == 'channels_first':
x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], 1, img_rows, img_cols)
x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], 1, img_rows, img_cols)
input_shape = (1, img_rows, img_cols)
else:
x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], img_rows, img_cols, 1)
x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], img_rows, img_cols, 1)
input_shape = (img_rows, img_cols, 1)
x_train = x_train.astype('float32')
x_test = x_test.astype('float32')
x_train /= 255
x_test /= 255
print('x_train shape:', x_train.shape)
print(x_train.shape[0], 'train samples')
print(x_test.shape[0], 'test samples')
# convert class vectors to binary class matrices
y_train = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_train, num_classes)
y_test = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_test, num_classes)
模型1:
model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv2D(32, kernel_size=(3, 3),
activation='relu',
input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(256, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
model.add(Dropout(0.25))
model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(128, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(0.5))
model.add(Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax'))
model.compile(loss=keras.losses.categorical_crossentropy,
optimizer=keras.optimizers.Adadelta(),
metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(x_train, y_train,
batch_size=batch_size,
epochs=epochs,
verbose=1,
validation_data=(x_test, y_test))
score = model.evaluate(x_test, y_test, verbose=0)
print('Test loss:', score[0])
print('Test accuracy:', score[1])
模型1准确性:
测试损失:0.023489486496470636测试准确度:0.9924
模式2:
model2 = Sequential()
model2.add(Conv2D(32, kernel_size=(3, 3),
activation='relu',
input_shape=input_shape))
model2.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(Conv2D(256, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model2.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
model2.add(Dropout(0.25))
model2.add(Flatten())
model2.add(Dense(128, activation='relu'))
model2.add(Dropout(0.5))
model2.add(Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax'))
model2.compile(loss=keras.losses.categorical_crossentropy,
optimizer=keras.optimizers.Adadelta(),
metrics=['accuracy'])
batch_size2 = 150
epochs2 = 12
step_epoch = x_train.shape[0] // batch_size2
def next_batch_train(i):
return x_train[i:i+batch_size2,:,:,:], y_train[i:i+batch_size2,:]
iter_num = 0
epoch_num = 0
model_outputs = []
loss_history = []
while epoch_num < epochs2:
while iter_num < step_epoch:
x,y = next_batch_train(iter_num)
loss_history += model2.train_on_batch(x,y)
iter_num += 1
print("EPOCH {} FINISHED".format(epoch_num + 1))
epoch_num += 1
iter_num = 0 # reset counter
score = model2.evaluate(x_test, y_test, verbose=0)
print('Test loss:', score[0])
print('Test accuracy:', score[1])
模型2的准确性:
测试损失:0.5577236003954947测试准确度:0.9387
差异的四个来源:
fit()
shuffle=True
默认使用,这包括第一个时期(及随后的时期)step_epoch
批次数量,但是要遍历step_epoch - 1
;更改<
为<=
next_batch_train
切片已经完成;这是它在做什么与需要做的事情:
x_train[0:128] --> x_train[1:129] --> x_train[2:130] --> ...
x_train[0:128] --> x_train[128:256] --> x_train[256:384] --> ...
为了解决这个问题,您应该在model2
火车循环中包含一个改组步骤-或fit
与shuffle=False
(不推荐)一起使用。另外,提示:64, 128, 256, 128, 64
Conv2D过滤器的布置非常糟糕;从某种意义上讲,您正在做的事情是大幅上采样,即“虚构数据”-如果您要使用更多的过滤器,则还应按strides
比例增加它们,以便各层之间的总张量大小保持相同(或更小)。
下面提到的所有修复程序和更新的种子功能;将其运行1个时间段,需要12个时间太长-如果1个可以工作,则将需要12个时间。可以保留您的原始模型,但是我建议您在下面的模型中进行测试,因为它的速度明显更快。
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
import random
def reset_seeds():
np.random.seed(1)
random.seed(2)
if tf.__version__[0] == '2':
tf.random.set_seed(3)
else:
tf.set_random_seed(3)
print("RANDOM SEEDS RESET")
reset_seeds()
model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv2D(32, kernel_size=(3, 3),
activation='relu',
input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
model.add(Dropout(0.25))
model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(128, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(0.5))
model.add(Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax'))
model.compile(loss=keras.losses.categorical_crossentropy,
optimizer=keras.optimizers.Adadelta(),
metrics=['accuracy'])
def next_batch_train(i):
return (x_train[i*batch_size2:(i+1)*batch_size2,:,:,:],
y_train[i*batch_size2:(i+1)*batch_size2,:])
iter_num = 0
epoch_num = 0
model_outputs = []
loss_history = []
while epoch_num < epochs2:
while iter_num < step_epoch:
x,y = next_batch_train(iter_num)
loss_history += model2.train_on_batch(x,y)
iter_num += 1
print("EPOCH {} FINISHED".format(epoch_num + 1))
epoch_num += 1
iter_num = 0 # reset counter
score = model2.evaluate(x_test, y_test, verbose=0)
print('Test loss:', score[0])
print('Test accuracy:', score[1])
更好的选择:使用改组
class TrainBatches():
def __init__(self, x_train, y_train, batch_size):
self.x_train=x_train
self.y_train=y_train
self.batch_size=batch_size
self.indices = [i for i in range(len(x_train))]
self.counter = 0
def get_next(self):
start = self.indices[self.counter] * self.batch_size
end = start + self.batch_size
self.counter += 1
return self.x_train[start:end], self.y_train[start:end]
def shuffle(self):
np.random.shuffle(self.indices)
print("BATCHES SHUFFLED")
train_batches = TrainBatches(x_train, y_train, batch_size)
while epoch_num < epochs2:
while iter_num <= step_epoch:
x, y = train_batches.get_next()
loss_history += model2.train_on_batch(x,y)
iter_num += 1
train_batches.shuffle()
train_batches.counter = 0
print("EPOCH {} FINISHED".format(epoch_num + 1))
epoch_num += 1
iter_num = 0 # reset counter
请注意,这不能保证您的结果会与一致fit()
,因为fit()
可能会以不同的方式(甚至使用随机种子)随机播放-但实际上实现是正确的。上面的内容在第一个时期也不会洗牌(易于更改)。
本文收集自互联网,转载请注明来源。
如有侵权,请联系[email protected] 删除。
我来说两句